Publication
A. Ilango, W. Wetzel, H. Scheich, and F. W. Ohl. The Combination of Appetitive and Aversive Reinforcers and the Nature of Their Interaction During Auditory Learning. Neuroscience 166:752โ762 (2010). [15]
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.010
Site summary โ not the original abstract
Ilango and colleagues tested tone-cued hurdle crossing in Mongolian gerbils, using footshock avoidance, rewarding electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area, or both; the combined condition accelerated acquisition and delayed extinction relative to either reinforcer alone. [15]
The omission results depended on the schedule: after continuously reinforced training, removing brain-stimulation reward briefly reduced performance while removing footshock did not; after partially reinforced training, removing footshock reduced responding while removing reward did not. [15]
These are results from a specific laboratory task with brain stimulation, not a comparison of dog-training methods or evidence that combining reward and aversive procedures is universally superior. [15]
Responses